Republicans want Governor Walker to explain John Doe

Not only is Governor Walker still insisting that he is not the target of the John Doe probe, his ever so interesting spokesperson Ciara Matthews is now trying to convince the public that such constant attention on this topic is merely a political tactic by the left to distract voters from the governor’s supposed successes. 
All that I can say to that is this; “Seriously, Governor Walker!  Do you truly not understand that you have given us little to no reason to believe much of anything that comes from your lips?” Sorry Governor Walker, but I am not one of Pavlov’s canines, so relentless repeating of the same rhetoric by you or Ciara is not making your suspicious claims any more believable in my book. 

Here is another thing Governor Walker, it is not just the Democrats that are asking for some explaining by you.  I have said in previous posts that if you in fact have not done anything illegal and if you are not under investigation as you claim, then why do you have a criminal defense fund?  

I understand that the Government Accountability Board allows for a criminal defense fund to be created for reasons other than when you or anyone else are connected to a criminal investigation or when charges have been filed against you.  But if you really are not the target as you claim, then why are you refusing to explain how the rules are being applied to your situation, allowing you to have such a fund? 

Without your voluntary explanation to us the public, I am finding it rather easy to pass judgment that is not all that favorable of you.  After all, without your explanation, it is easy to base my judgment on the fact that several key people close to you are being questioned, some being convicted, and many being granted immunity.  It is also easy to pass judgment on the suspicious nature of you having hired six top notch criminal defense attorneys from across the United States.  It is also easy to pass judgment based on the more than $200,000 that you have already racked up in legal fees for attorneys to defend yourself for a situation that you claim not to be part of. 

Your seemingly non-cooperation in providing us the public with answers to this matter is rather interesting to say the least.  I wonder how many other republicans feel the same way and how it will impact their actions at the polls on June 5^th?

Sincerely,


Gary

_____________________________________________________________________________

Legal defense fund questions persist

http://www.wrn.com/2012/05/legal-defense-fund-questions-persist/